Children’s Books Are Never Just for Children

Who today remembers the plays of AA Milne or the political writing of Erich Kästner? Yet their children’s books are read the world over.

Salman Rushdie has suggested that of all his work – including Midnight’s Children, which won the Best of the Booker – his children’s books may last the longest. He recalled being urged to write them by publisher Kurt Maschler, who had published Kästner’s Emil and the Detectives.

“As Kurt Maschler said to me, ‘It’s the only one of his books that’s still in print!’ That was a lesson I didn’t forget. It may end up that Haroun and the Sea of Stories and Luka and the Fire of Life are the only books of mine that remain in print. And that would be fine, actually.”

Neil Gaiman tells the similar story of AA Milne, who is no longer remembered as a West End playwright or features editor of Punch, but only as “the author of two books of short stories and two books of verse for small children”.

It’s striking how long children’s books can last. One explanation may be the way in which they’re read. They become part of our emotional autobiographies, acquiring associations and memories, more like music than prose.

Another explanation may lie in the fact that children’s books are designed with re-reading in mind. For all children’s writers are conscious that our books may be re-read by children themselves.

“Yes, kids read and re-read favourite books,” says Francesca Simon. “My favourite Horrid Henry books to sign are the ones which are so dog-eared and stained through re-reading they are practically translucent. When Simon Mayo interviewed me, he commented that he had read them to his kids over 200 times. He looked like a man undergoing penance …”

A similar view is taken by Gaiman, who writes for all ages. “When I’m writing for kids,” he says, “I’m always assuming that a story, if it is loved, is going to be re-read. So I try and be much more conscious of it than I am with adults, just in terms of word choices. I once said that while I could not justify every word in American Gods, I can justify every single word in Coraline.”

Many parents will know this already. They sometimes even fear there’s something wrong with a child who re-reads favourite books rather than new ones.

“There’s nothing wrong with them,” says Charlotte Hacking, of the Centre for Literacy in Primary Education (CLPE). “Children need to read and re-read and keep coming back to books, looking at them in different ways. It’s actually a really good thing; it allows you to go deeper.”

So re-reading is a given for children’s authors. It’s one reason why we try to write books that have many layers and work on different levels, rewarding re-reading by growing richer each time.

But if this is true, then why are children’s books rarely considered for literary prizes such as the Man Booker and the Costa? This year’s Costa coverage barely considered the possibility that the children’s prize-winner, Kate Saunders’s Five Children on the Western Front, might win the overall prize.

Yet it’s an exceptional book that already feels like a classic. In a stunning twist on E Nesbit’s Five Children and It, Saunders takes those carefree Edwardian children and plunges them into the first world war. For they belonged to the generation who would die in the trenches, and she works this to devastating emotional effect.

“It’s an amazing book,” says Guardian children’s books editor Julia Eccleshare. “If that was an adult book working with Jane Austen, as it were, people would be wowing about it. The textual play on a classic, in the adult world, would receive far more praise than I think she has been noticed for – yet.”

Perhaps it’s unsurprising, given that only one winner of the Costa/Whitbread children’s book prize has ever won the overall book of the year. That was Philip Pullman’s The Amber Spyglass, back in 2001.

“It hasn’t happened since,” says Pullman. “But one day they’ll have to find a book they just have to give it to. Maybe one day a children’s book will get the Booker prize. Why not? Why not a children’s author winning the Nobel prize?”

Sarah Churchwell, one of last year’s Booker judges, has written about the judging process. She said that it “asks of books something they’re not really designed for: to be read three times in a row by people probing for weakness. Most books just crumble under that kind of pressure: only the most rich, the most layered, continue to dazzle and reveal ever more.”

She concluded that only two books on last year’s list met this criterion. Yet as a children’s writer, I couldn’t help thinking that this is exactly what all children’s books are designed to do. They may achieve it to a greater or lesser degree, but that’s always the aim.
Advertisement

Children’s laureate Malorie Blackman agrees. “Call me biased,” she says, “but I find the standard of storytelling in children’s books and books for young adults second to none. I find it telling that even now, there are far more children’s books and books for teens that I’d like to re-read than books for adults.”

These are the books that get handed down through generations, becoming classics, but perhaps their readability works against them. Reflecting on the children’s books he still re-reads, Pullman observes: “Part of the joy of all these books is a sort of perfect lightness and grace in the words. Everything is in its right place. Not a comma needs changing. Things like that make it possible to read them again and again without fatigue.”

That lightness and grace is a hallmark of the best children’s writing, along with the multi-layered richness Churchwell found so rare. Yet only The Amber Spyglass and Mark Haddon’s The Curious Incident of the Dog In the Night-Time have ever appeared on a Booker longlist. Not one single children’s book has made the shortlist, let alone won, in the history of the prize.

Meanwhile, media coverage of children’s books is vanishingly small. Former Children’s laureate Julia Donaldson has pointed out that they get less than one in 40 of all review spaces. And yet children’s books now account for one in four of all books sold in the UK. This is the most vibrant sector of British publishing, outperforming adult fiction in 2014.

A generational shift may now be occurring. For many of my generation, growing up in the 1970s with books like Watership Down, story is story, regardless of age. That’s even truer of younger writers.

“I certainly don’t see children’s books as being in any way lesser than adult literature,” says Katherine Woodfine, born in the 1980s, whose debut The Mystery of the Clockwork Sparrow is published this year. “If anything, I’d argue the opposite. Children’s books can have a hugely powerful effect on their readers, helping to shape and inform their view of the world, in a way that adult books rarely achieve. They’re the first literature we engage with, and what’s more, they’re often the first art works we ever encounter.”

Woodfine’s response to the lack of coverage is to create new media space. Together with Melissa Cox of Waterstones, she hosts Down the Rabbit Hole on Resonance 104.4FM: the only dedicated children’s books radio show. It’s part of a vibrant online community, too. Twitter, the Guardian children’s books site, and other digital spaces are connecting writers, readers, bloggers, vloggers, booksellers, librarians and teachers as never before, while hashtag chats such as #ukyachat and #ukmgchat regularly trend.

“Since JK Rowling’s Harry Potter and Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials,” Jeanette Winterson has observed, “children’s literature has been repositioned as central, not peripheral, shifting what children read, what we write about what children read, and what we read as adults. At last we seem to understand that imagination is ageless.”

It’s true that such books brought children’s fiction to higher prominence in the early 2000s, but they are part of a literature that is continually regenerating itself. And as the generation who grew up on Rowling and Pullman begin to publish their own books, it will only go further.

Yet neither media coverage nor literary prizes have kept pace. Until they do, anyone looking for the richest contemporary literature might be advised to consult the lists for prizes such as the Guardian children’s fiction award and the Carnegie medal instead. Because that is where you will find book after book that stands up to re-reading: the true classics of the future.

Read More

Youtube Comment Bot – Help With Working With a Youtube Social Networking Sites Advertiser.

SoundCloud recently announced it struck an extensive-awaited licensing cope with Universal Music, whose hit roster includes Kanye West, Adele and Taylor Swift. This latest deal provides buying soundcloud plays with 50 % coverage on the list of “Big Four” – Warner Brothers also has an agreement with SoundCloud; Sony BMG and Sony/ATV will still be holding out.

The Universal deal, as well as SoundCloud’s latest round of funding, is a strong indicator the Berlin-based music-content platform is really a serious competitive threat to Spotify.

While SoundCloud usually gets significantly less media buzz than Spotify, you wouldn’t realize it based on their numbers. First, while both SoundCloud and Spotify have large user bases, Spotify has only 75 million active users in comparison to SoundCloud’s more than 175 million monthly listeners.

How come SoundCloud have two times as many registered users? Spotify is far more of any paid service for streaming music. The entire amount of users matters less to Spotify than what percentage of them are able to pay. In comparison, SoundCloud is less focused entirely on monetization (for the time being) and will afford to provide free content from the name of growth.

Second, SoundCloud has far better unit economics than Spotify. Why? SoundCloud’s producers, users uploading content, exist to construct a following and are not quite as focused on monetization. The agreement with Universal simply wards off any potential lawsuits over copyright infringement. As opposed, Spotify pays out 80 % of the revenue to content license holders.

SoundCloud has a platform business design where its content articles are created by its network of users, not acquired through licensing deals. For SoundCloud, the better audio producers that join the network, the greater listeners will want to join. This rise in users, in turn, incentivizes more creatives to post their music or podcasts on SoundCloud, along with the network effects still build following that.

Once you discover an artist you like on SoundCloud, you can … get lost inside a rabbit hole of music awesomeness.

As opposed, Spotify is primarily a reseller of music inventory belonging to record labels and publishers. It’s simply a distributor for the latest releases, type of just like a Walmart for music streaming. A lot of the songs on Spotify you could see on Apple Music, Pandora or any other streaming service. Because of this, Spotify lacks the network effects that SoundCloud enjoys.

Think about the difference between YouTube and Netflix. The distinction is identical here, although with music rather than video content. Given Netflix’s relative success, it might seem it is a favorable comparison for Spotify, nevertheless it isn’t. YouTube is worth $85 billion, or 2 times the price of Netflix. And you only have to understand one number to know why: Netflix will spend more money on content in 2016 than any of CBS, Viacom, Time Warner or Fox. Like Spotify, the vast majority of what Netflix earns goes to license owners.

Fetty Wap started being a SoundCloud sensation before dominating the billboard charts. DJ titans Diplo and Skrillex each built their presence and notoriety by remixing already famous songs on SoundCloud and making use of their following like a jumping off denote produce original music. This helps explain why SoundCloud has a much better relationship using its creatives than Spotify seems to.

Additionally, finding new songs and podcasts is an essential part of your listening experience. But on Spotify, a lot of the music is content you can find elsewhere. The vast majority of Spotify’s content comes from major record labels and is also freely available on other streaming services, like Apple Music or Pandora. But if you would like get the latest hot tracks beyond the mainstream, you’ll only locate them on SoundCloud.

SoundCloud is increasingly becoming an area where users can discover original content, for example new music and new artists. Users can follow the other, which allows you to find music depending on another user’s musical taste and preferences. The platform gives a simple like-and-repost feature, which exposes troves and troves of activity that allows discovery by other users. Once you find an artist you enjoy on SoundCloud, after that you can see which songs that artist likes and acquire lost 80dexnpky a rabbit hole of music awesomeness.

This sort of musical serendipity is extremely specific to youtube comment bot due to the platform’s original unique content. This original content gives SoundCloud network effects that improve everyday as more new artists (who aren’t ready for Spotify) and content producers upload their content. While the inventory on Spotify is finite and dear, SoundCloud has the opportunity of YouTube-like hyper growth.

So long as the platform continues to attract talented new artists and content producers, its future is extremely bright. Spotify, on the flip side, may struggle to stay profitable. Like Netflix before it, Spotify faces a continual fight with rights owners over its streaming revenue. At the same time, other popular streaming services can provide constant competition. If I were required to bet on one of many two companies today, I’d opt for the “YouTube of Audio.”

Read More

MLB Caps Australia – If Purchasing, Study the Extensive Sports Article About MLB Baseball Caps.

Besides watches, you can find few accessories guys are more impassioned about than hats.

Specifically: mlb caps australia. An SG reader use it quite succinctly from the comments of any recent post, “You’re either a hat guy or you’re not.”

While this might be true-it’s less than simple. A brief poll of some individuals the SG braintrust (read: our guy friends) said that, for men who give you a lick about looking great, a well-chosen cap can go a long way. For a few, it’s a personal signature and weekend fixture. For some individuals, a good way to place a friendly finishing touch by using an otherwise more put-together look. And and then there are individuals who feel a baseball hat is only to keep your hair out of your eyes while driving with the windows down and sunroof open. (Fair enough.)

Practicality, personality, bald spots… There is a million reasons we like and fully support guys rocking a hat with style and confidence. In relation to choosing your cap style, anything from team loyalty to coastal heritage comes into play.

Below, we disintegrate the five most widely used baseball caps…

Most guys we all know prefer this kind of mlb sydney. The snapback is adopted within almost every “style camp” you can think of, from streetwear to athleisure, preppy, hipster, California cool… We might continue on. Our favorite versions (and the ones most highly endorsed with the braintrust) rep cities, teams or a select brand like Nike, as an example. On a practical note, dark color caps may go generally anything, and hide most signs and symptoms of frequent wear (sweat in the inner band, anyone?).

The Fitted Cap

At SG HQ we’re in the mindset that fitted caps are pretty much for sports teams only (caveat: if you’re willing to be a walking billboard for the next cause). So pick your team and obtain the dimensions right-oversized hats usually are not a thing. Another note: Consider the stickers off! We’ve had a lot of chatter inside the comments concerning this topic before, and the consensus is definitely, peel ’em. Now.

The Five-Panel

This hat is so menswear. It’s popularity has lost a certain amount of steam within the last year roughly, but what started as being a Brooklyn hipster-on-a-bicycle thing has become a surfer-hipster-city dweller-anyone-with-a-head thing. With all the right look, we dig it. We’d also bring that this might be the only real kind of hat seems cool with an all-over print-typically anything overly fussy or busy in design looks foolish. Therefore if you’re keen on this style, seize the second and obtain bold with pattern.

The Trucker Hat

We were tempted to go with a difficult-and-fast “No” with this one, but we’ll give graces for a few select styles. The baseball caps australia draws up cringe-worthy flashbacks to the Ed Hardy days for most 82dexnpky us, and the fact is there’s not a lot of style attract this type of hat. The mesh panel inside the back does enable a breathable, cooler fit, and perhaps in some settings (Camping? Over a boat? Like a costume?) we could provide the trucker a pass. Maybe. The jury continues to be out…

The “Dad Hat”

You already know the one we’re talking about…made popular to the young folks in the early aughts thanks to Polo Ralph Lauren, these soft-style hats are getting to be a form of signature for dad-style and über-prepsters. While there’s nothing particularly wrong using this hat, there has been enough updates for this style to don a traditional preppy cap minus the unintended link to the dad-bod phenomena. Decide on a logo-less cap inside a unique hue or texture of course, if you’re so inclined, apply the snapback logo trend to the soft-style hat.

Read More

Hampton Bay Ceiling Fan – Study the Fundamentals Concerning the Home Cooling Sector in Advance of Investing in Bedroom Fans.

For years, ceiling fans have been the best choice for comfort as well as savings in lighting. Ceiling fans are beautiful and practical and create a great addition to your rooms. The reality that ceiling fans may help lower the temperature of any warm room explains how ceiling fans work to actually lower energy bills. Plus, the fact that ceiling fans have the option of a light means they are a well known and prime choice as being a lighting fixture.

The ceiling fan industry is huge, with ceiling fans being manufactured in seemingly endless styles, colors, configurations, motors, finishes and a lot more. So how does one have the choice? You will find important qualities that hamptonbayceilingfanblog.bravesites.com should have, the most important that are quiet performance and steady operation (meaning that it can be safe and hasbeen installed properly).

Brand reputation matters with ceiling fans, and it’s worth selecting a reputable company that stands behind its fans as well as offers warranties on the fan’s motor (a great warranty is going to be for 10 years). Ceiling fans cost any where from $24 to several hundred dollars for top-end, top-quality fans. Cheaper fans usually have weaker, noisier motors and that’s precisely what you don’t want. Some really good ceiling fan manufacturers include Hunter, Casablanca and Emerson. Visit any kind of their Websites to see hundreds of different kinds of ceiling fan. The motor of ceiling fans needs to have sealed bearings which require no lubrication and must run quietly, without any major problems, for approximately 12 years. Be also sure the fan you get shows up by Underwriters Laboratories or even an equivalenttesting agency.

What kind of controls do you want to your fan? Ceiling fans feature several control options, say for example a pull chain or handheld remote control. Would you like a fan with multiple settings and speeds? Do you need the sunshine to get a dimmer? Many of these determines not only the cost of the fan but how it really is installed, also. Make sure you get a reliable electrician to put in your new ceiling fan. Most of the hamptonbayceilingfanblog.tumblr.com include some really advanced features like the capability to automatically adjust the fan speed to accommodate variations in roomtemperature as well as turn the fan light off if you are not home.

Blades play a crucial role in determining how well a ceiling fan will perform. There are various blade characteristics that happen to be important, including the number of blades, their size and length. Usually, the better blades, the greater the cost of the fan. The most frequent amount of blades is four, though three and in many cases five blades are not uncommon. The amount of blades depends upon your decision and might not be bound to the strength and satisfaction in the fan. The 74dexnpky and gratification of the fan is additionally related to the duration of the blades. Blades are available in several lengths, measured through the full blade sweep they produce: 30, 42, 44, 46, 50, 52 and 60 inches. Blade color and material are another consideration to create. Blades come in natural wood, or in painted blades made out of solid wood, cross-laminated veneer (plywood) and less-expensive veneered constant-density board. Popular finishes include natural, appliance white, cherry wood, oak, walnut, bleached oak, white, faux granite, rosewood and black.

Movement of air can be a factor of the pitch, length and quantity of blades; their distance from your ceiling; as well as their revolutions each and every minute (rpm). A weak motor can spin short blades quickly if the blades are at a minimum pitch of around 10 degrees, though this type of fan may very well be noisier than a fan that swirls 14-degree, longer blades more slowly. The best advice is always to choose hamptonbayceilingfanblog.wordpress.com wisely to meet the actual needs from the room it will probably be installed in. And make sure you get your ceiling fan installed properly from a professional electrician.

Read More